TM
MBA NEWS, CURRENT AFFAIRS & OPINIONS
Spring/Summer Edition | MBA Application Tips | Career insights | Podcasts | 2026 Rankings
Small "tight knit" community or
Smaller pool of talent?
ARE SMALLER PROGRAMS HIDING THE BITTER TRUTH?
While schools convey a message of a small "tight-knit" community, the data suggests something else!
Lower acceptance rates, Lower capacity to place in diverse industries, etc., may improve the rankings of the programs due to lower applicant volume and the smaller class size, leading to lower acceptance rates. Less pressure on the programs to place people across the industries may create an uneven playing field in favor of smaller programs.
We uncovered the truth by looking at the data to understand what could be the potential implications.
Despite their high rankings, many programs in the United States exhibit varying levels of appeal. A program that ranks above several others may still attract fewer applications and a candidate pool. Co-incidentally, many of these programs also have smaller class sizes too. Why?
MBA Program "capacity" can affect the rankings! High capacity programs affected adversely by the economic climate
(Opinion) Upon observing the employment report trends at the M7 and other top programs in the US, patterns emerged that suggested that the programs with lower capacity (smaller class size and overall strength of the alumni) programs end up outperforming the peer schools.
This is partly due the share of students going into consulting, finance and technology industries. Schools such as UVA Darden and Tuck seem to be outperforming other peer schools.
Harvard Business School appears to have had a tough overall recruiting season where from the 65% of the class seeking employment, only 84% accepted an offer.
What's preventing the schools from retaining talent?
While the number of accepted students of schools such as Michigan Ross, Duke Fuqua, UVA Darden and Tuck are within the same range- around 1000, the number enrolled is higher for some while lower for others. Raising a question- How do students choose?
SAME SAME BUT DIFFERENT!
USNews has come up with a "new" methodology to rank the MBA Programs by specialty. However, there is a catch! As it says on the website:
These rankings, as well as an additional ranking of executive MBA programs, are based solely on ratings by top school officials.
In a methodological change this year, business schools informed U.S. News in advance whether they awarded degrees, concentrations or substantive graduate curriculum in each specialty, and provided the names of a top official engaged in each specialty area.
USNews has also provided the rationale behind their change as the previous methodology as noted by MBA Times™ in the fall edition fell short on many aspects. While the ranking metrics are still dependent on peer voting, as cited in the fall edition, the current methodology could also come with some consequences.
LEGACIES FALL AS THE NEW PARAMETERS EMERGE
USNews MBA Rankings' new methodology has come as a shock to many programs. Babson recently lost the #1 spot in Entrepreneurship after holding it for more than three decades.
What's impressive to note is that while the methodology has slightly changed, Babson's reputation in Entrepreneurship has still kept it at #4 tied with UC Berkeley Haas school of Business.
Other schools impacted are CMU Tepper (Analytics), UT Austin McCombs (Accounting), Michigan State Broad (Supply chain), South Carolina Moore (International), etc. Many schools that once called the #1 spot their home have been replaced by others who took the lead.
Babson loses the top spot in entrepreneurship after more than three decades on top!
AI IS HERE FOR YOUR JOB!
Podcasts that can help you navigate it
In this Nano Tool for Leaders, behavioral experts offer tips on how to reduce employee resistance to generative AI. It could help leaders reduce resistance to generative AI by addressing employees’ core psychological needs — competence, autonomy, and relatedness — through the AWARE framework.
The Khan Academy founder and HBS grad returns to discuss AI disruption—preparing for The Great Reskilling and challenging the status quo in instruction, assessment, and credentials.
Sal Khan on retooling workforce development and redesigning college
In this episode of Think Fast Talk Smart, Raman and host Matt Abrahams explore what it takes to navigate a rapidly changing workplace. From the “Five C’s” to practical ways to redesign your role around human strengths, Raman shares how to stay relevant as work evolves, the power of audience-first communication, and why great storytelling starts with understanding yourself.
EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES IMPROVED!!!
OR DID THEY REALLY?
A job market that simply doesn't exist!
The students are having a difficult time navigating the current job market mostly because most students seem to be working on the old B-school model and preparing themselves for a job market that doesn't exist.
The students are preparing for skills such as Python, PowerBi, Excel etc., when the new world requires them to be more proactive on understanding the deeper meaning behind the technical work that AI can do in seconds.
People will have to step out of the "framework mindset" if they have to show their uniqueness.
EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES STILL NOT GOOD ENOUGH
MBA was designed to equip people with the necessary tools and skills to perform in high-income and high stakes roles. People skills such as negotiations, managing teams and conflict resolution have now become easier and even more difficult, thanks to AI. AI agents can now automate most of the work taken up by Product managers, Technical experts, Consultants and even Finance and Accounting professionals. Because the AI is designed using the frameworks that most B-school alumni operate on, the professionals find it difficult to navigate the job market.
MBA: Lower ROI,
higher risk and
increased tuition!?
New world, old world
and everything in between
(Opinion) In a world where technical expertise is abundant, communication is professional, jobs are automated and job seekers have skills that are no longer valued, a redesign in the curriculum to include more complex business situations to debate while AI being used as a catalyst to speed up the laborious and technical work could become a norm in the classrooms.
Some schools have already started integrating AI into their core curriculum.
A PEDAGOGY REVOLUTION
WILL THE TEACHING
METHODOLOGIES
CHANGE?
The most popular "Case Method" at the risk of obsolescence?
(Opinion) As AI becomes increasingly capable of reading cases, understanding the financials, creating frameworks and preparing a full draft as a solution to the case, the case method faces a greater risk of obsolescence.
Since the case method is popular among most programs, it remains to be seen how the Business schools will navigate the cases in the age of AI.
The traditional "team-based learning" approach also faces a dilemma as AI can create perspectives from different disciplines and eliminate the need for collaboration to achieve a productive outcome.
Since AI is here to stay, it is safe to assume that the schools will have to undergo a fundamental change that can shift the culture entirely.
Action Learning & Experiential Learning methods could see a potential rise since those offer more room to integrate AI within the pre-existing curriculum. MIT Sloan and Michigan Ross could lead the way as the other programs try to find ways to develop a sustainable pedagogy.
While schools convey a message of a small "tight-knit" community, the data suggests something else!
Lower acceptance rates, Lower capacity to place in diverse industries, etc., may improve the rankings of the programs due to lower applicant volume and the smaller class size, leading to lower acceptance rates. Less pressure on the programs to place people across the industries may create an uneven playing field in favor of smaller programs.
We uncovered the truth by looking at the data to understand what could be the potential implications.
Global and practical learning experiences can be a solution
(Opinion) Upon speaking to some MBA students at the American programs, MBA Times™ found that the students are able to learn through the global field experiences and practical experiences such as industry treks, company organized workshops etc. As the interest in practical learning increases, it could pave the way to a potential solution.
RIGGED OR DEMOCRATIC?
(Opinion) As the elections at most MBA programs come to a close, MBA Times™ team did some research to understand the underlying political agendas to win the student elections. Student government that is supposed to act in the interests of the students they represent could often end up working in the interests of one demographic. Here are a few concerning points:
Demographic lens: As the number of international students is less than 50% and the number of the underrepresented American minorities is less than 50%, the elections may not always allow for a fair outcome due to the inequities in the resources that certain other demographics may have. Additionally, while the schools portray themselves as diverse communities, the student election outcomes convey a completely different story.
Employment lens: Since the students from international backgrounds don't have access to a network for recruiting in the US, some students who have been pre-sponsored by employers or students who have received an offer through their corresponding diversity group, may use that as a leverage to influence the outcomes.
Bias/Favoritism lens: The Dean's office or the program office may have certain bias towards their demographics which could lead them to unconsciously support the growth and progress of some over the others. While this is also intertwined greatly with the internal politics within the institution, where certain pressures may sway the people acting differently, the representation in the student body could still be greatly influenced by bias.
BIGGEST DISADVANTAGE: International Students may be at the biggest disadvantage due to the power difference and inequitable resources. While others get access to exclusive resources in the name of reducing the barriers, the same is not at the disposal of others.
Would it make any difference in the culture of the MBA programs and the employment outcomes for international students in those programs if there was a greater representation across the student government? Would the outcomes be any different if there was a vocal opposition or would the influence of the institution lead to completely defeating the purpose of the student body elections?
Join the discussion on WhatsApp